nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: Is CanFestival3 conform to DS301 v.4.02 ? nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210: nico@210:
nico@210: nico@210: next nico@210: nico@210: up nico@210: nico@210: previous nico@210: nico@210: contents nico@210:
nico@210: Next: LINUX nico@210: Up: General nico@210: Previous: How to fit the nico@210:   Contents nico@210:
nico@210:
nico@210: nico@210: nico@210:

nico@210: Is CanFestival3 conform to DS301 v.4.02 ? nico@210:

nico@210: Thanks to Philippe Foureys (IUT of Valence), a slave node have been nico@210: tested with the National Instrument CanOpen Conformance Test. It passed nico@210: the test with success. nico@210: nico@210:

nico@210: Some very small unconformity have been found in very unusual situations, nico@210: for example in the SDO code response to wrong messages. nico@210: nico@210:

nico@210:

nico@210:
nico@210: epimerde nico@211: 2007-06-06 nico@210:
nico@210: nico@210: